Find Your Store
Home Page

Cart, contains 0 items

When autocomplete results are available use up and down arrows to review and enter to select. Touch device users, explore by touch or with swipe gestures.
Expert Help
Earn Rewards

POC
Re-Cycle Boxer - Men's

Be the first to review
$41.97 - $80.00
Up to 40% off
Color:Turmaline Navy

Size:

Size Chart

Quantity


Why We Like The Re-Cycle Boxer

POC's Re-Cycle Boxer offers all of the benefits of comfortable chamois padding without the compressive features of traditional cycling shorts. The re-cycle boxers are constructed from recycled polyester fabric that wicks away sweat and dries quickly. The chamois insert is optimal for off-road riding. We like that these shorts provide a solution for mountain bikers who would benefit from padding, but who don't wish to wear shorts.


Details

  • Padded boxers for riders who want to forgo cycling shorts
  • Constructed from recycled polyester for quick drying
  • Wicks away sweat for a breathable feel
  • Chamois insert is ideal for off-road riding
  • Item #POCZ1AW
Responsible Collection
Recycled/Repurposed
Material
recycled polyester
Season
spring, summer, fall
Fit
form-fitting
Chamois
yes
Bib
no
Recommended Use
road cycling
Manufacturer Warranty
1 year

Overall Rating

1 based on 1 ratings

Review Summary

1 Stars - 1 reviews
2 Stars - 0 reviews
3 Stars - 0 reviews
4 Stars - 0 reviews
5 Stars - 0 reviews

Fits True To Size

Screen reader users: the following list provides a visual scale to illustrate the product fit. Please refer to the heading above for the fit type in text.
Runs smallTrue to sizeRuns large

What do you think about this product?

View

Selecting an option will reload the available reviews on the page
1 out of 5 stars

May 8, 2024

NOPE

Familiarity:
I've used it several times
Size Bought:
M
Height:
5' 9"
Weight:
157

Thought I'd try a higher-end short rather than your basic Amazon Baleaf.... the pads don't sit in the right place, and the legs ride up and pinch....very uncomfortable.....$20 Baleaf blows these away. And of course I waited 35 days before thinking of processing return because I was trying to give them a chance, 5 days too late...grr

Lawrence T